1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2004 Acura RSX
To start off, 2004 Acura RSX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 511 more horse power than 2004 Acura RSX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura RSX weights approximately 362 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1986 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Jaguar XJR | 2004 Acura RSX | |
| Make | Jaguar | Acura |
| Model | XJR | RSX |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6499 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 671 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1222 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |
