1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP) has 371 more horse power than 2005 Land Rover LR3. (300 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Land Rover LR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1601 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
| Model | XJR | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6499 cc | 4390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 671 HP | 300 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 2461 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 86 L |
