1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 489 more horse power than 2008 Volvo XC90. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJR | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJR | XC90 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6499 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |