1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 521 more horse power than 2009 Suzuki Equator. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2009 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 115 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Jaguar XJR | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XJR | Equator |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6499 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 671 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 80 L |
