1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Ford F-350
To start off, 2010 Ford F-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 371 more horse power than 2010 Ford F-350. (300 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford F-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-350 weights approximately 112 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XJR | F-350 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6499 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 6260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 115 L |