1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 BMW X1
To start off, 2013 BMW X1 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 433 more horse power than 2013 BMW X1. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2013 BMW X1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X1 weights approximately 830 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2013 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJR | 2013 BMW X1 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | XJR | X1 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6499 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4484 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1545 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 63 L |