1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 2013 Dodge DURANGO. (286 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge DURANGO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 1452 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
Model | XJR | DURANGO |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6499 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 2312 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3042 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 93 L |