1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. (503 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1730 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
| Model | XJR | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6499 cc | 2013 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 671 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 2590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1784 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2745 mm |
