1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Sequoia. (376 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Sequoia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1854 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2013 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XJR | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6499 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 2714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1955 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 100 L |