1986 Jaguar XJS vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1986 Jaguar XJS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 310 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1986 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Jaguar XJS | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | XJS | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3590 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2680 mm |
