1986 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 455 more horse power than 1986 Jeep Cherokee. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1986 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 200 kg more than 2003 Pagani Zonda.
Because 1986 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Pagani Zonda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Jeep Cherokee | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Jeep | Pagani |
| Model | Cherokee | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2068 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 542 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
