1986 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 438 more horse power than 1986 Jeep Cherokee. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1986 Jeep Cherokee.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (530 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Jeep Cherokee. (180 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Jeep Cherokee | 2011 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | Cherokee | R8 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2068 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 525 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 90 L |
