1986 Lada 2105 vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 300 (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1986 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 300 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1986 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Lada 2105 | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Lada | Proton |
| Model | 2105 | 300 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1197 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2450 mm |
