1986 Lada 2105 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1986 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 635 kg more than 1986 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Lada 2105 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Lada | Cadillac |
Model | 2105 | BLS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |