1986 Lada 2105 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1986 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 1062 kg more than 1986 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Lada 2105 | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 2105 | CX-09 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2875 mm |