1986 Lada Samara vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,288 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Lada Samara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lada Samara (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lada Samara should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Lada Samara (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Lada Samara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Lada Samara | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lada | Renault |
Model | Samara | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |