1986 Lancia ECV vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lancia ECV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lancia ECV would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 526 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626.
Because 1986 Lancia ECV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Lancia ECV | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | ECV | 626 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1757 cc | 1840 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
