1986 Lancia ECV vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lancia ECV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lancia ECV would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 472 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1986 Lancia ECV has manual transmission. 1986 Lancia ECV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Lancia ECV | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | ECV | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1757 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |