1986 Lancia ECV vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lancia ECV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lancia ECV would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 446 more horse power than 2003 Honda CR-V. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Lancia ECV | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Lancia | Honda |
| Model | ECV | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1757 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 154 HP |
| Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 172 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
