1986 Lancia ECV vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lancia ECV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lancia ECV would be higher. At 1,757 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Lancia ECV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 503 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 1986 Lancia ECV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1986 Lancia ECV has manual transmission. 1986 Lancia ECV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Lancia ECV | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | ECV | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1757 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 97 HP |
Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 186 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |