1986 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1986 Lincoln Continental. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1986 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Lincoln Continental (366 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1986 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Lincoln Continental | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Lincoln | Holden |
| Model | Continental | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
