1986 Maserati 228 vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1986 Maserati 228 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Maserati 228 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati 228 (252 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 240. (152 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati 228 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 240 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1986 Maserati 228.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati 228 (365 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 240. (240 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1986 Maserati 228 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Maserati 228 | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | 228 | 240 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2790 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2650 mm |