1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 1975 Volvo 264
To start off, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 264. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 264. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 264 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 264. (203 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 264.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 1975 Volvo 264 | |
Make | Maserati | Volvo |
Model | Bi Turbo | 264 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2650 mm |