1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo weights approximately 325 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Maserati | Zastava |
| Model | Bi Turbo | 102 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2160 mm |
