1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 1999 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1999 Fiat Siena is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1999 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1999 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Fiat Siena weights approximately 205 kg more than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 1999 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Maserati | Fiat |
Model | Bi Turbo | Siena |
Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1300 kg |