1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 479 kg more than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (248 Nm). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Maserati | Mercury |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Sable |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 248 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1574 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2760 mm |
