1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2004 BMW 316
To start off, 2004 BMW 316 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2004 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 316 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 316. (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2004 BMW 316 | |
Make | Maserati | BMW |
Model | Bi Turbo | 316 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2730 mm |