1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo weights approximately 81 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Rustler |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1586 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1014 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2570 mm |
