1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Maserati | Nissan |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Cube |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2830 mm |
