1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | Bi Turbo | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
