1986 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. (183 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | Bi Turbo | UTE |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
