1986 Mazda 626 vs. 1959 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1986 Mazda 626 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda 626 | 1959 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 626 | Rekord |
Year Released | 1986 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |