1986 Mazda 626 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1986 Mazda 626 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mazda 626 weights approximately 272 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda 626 | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 626 | Colt |
Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1082 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2310 mm |