1986 Mazda 626 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 626. (117 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (188 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 626. (171 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda 626 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 626 | Megane |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 188 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2690 mm |