1986 Mazda 929 vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1986 Mazda 929 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 195 kg more than 1986 Mazda 929.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda 929 | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 929 | Starfire |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 6965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3130 mm |