1986 Mazda 929 vs. 1999 Saturn SL
To start off, 1999 Saturn SL is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda 929 (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1999 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1999 Saturn SL.
Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (230 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mazda 929 | 1999 Saturn SL | |
| Make | Mazda | Saturn |
| Model | 929 | SL |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
