1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,327 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (242 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929.
Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo C70 (330 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mazda 929 | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 929 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2327 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2800 mm |
