1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (259 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mazda 929 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
| Model | 929 | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 259 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3010 mm |
