1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda 929 (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (259 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda 929 | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | 929 | Ultimate 112 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 259 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1570 mm |