1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2008 Volvo C30
To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo C30 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C30 weights approximately 129 kg more than 1986 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo C30. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mazda 929 | 2008 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 929 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1279 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |
