1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2008 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda 929 (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2008 Volvo XC90. (105 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 357 kg more than 1986 Mazda 929.

Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (259 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Mazda 929 2008 Volvo XC90
Make Mazda Volvo
Model 929 XC90
Year Released 1986 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2953 cc 2521 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 190 HP 105 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 259 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 1500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 77.4 mm 93.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.9:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1625 kg 1982 kg
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 4250 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2870 mm