1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2009 Volvo V70

To start off, 2009 Volvo V70 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V70 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929.

Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (259 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo V70. (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo V70.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Mazda 929 2009 Volvo V70
Make Mazda Volvo
Model 929 V70
Year Released 1986 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2953 cc 3192 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 190 HP 232 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 259 Nm 236 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.9:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2820 mm