1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda 929 (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (259 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda 929 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 929 | TT |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 259 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2469 mm |