1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 662 kg more than 1986 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda 929 | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 929 | STS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2957 mm |