1986 Mazda 929 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 618 kg more than 1986 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda 929 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 929 | CTS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1768 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1442 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2880 mm |