1986 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1996 Opel Astra
To start off, 1996 Opel Astra is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1996 Opel Astra. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Opel Astra.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Opel Astra. (170 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Opel Astra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mazda RX-7 | 1996 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | RX-7 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2354 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 246 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |
