1986 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1996 Tata E220
To start off, 1996 Tata E220 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Tata E220. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Tata E220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Tata E220. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Tata E220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mazda RX-7 | 1996 Tata E220 | |
| Make | Mazda | Tata |
| Model | RX-7 | E220 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2354 cc | 2197 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 246 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2810 mm |
