1986 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1997 Volvo C70
To start off, 1997 Volvo C70 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo C70 (190 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1986 Mazda RX-7. (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo C70 (270 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda RX-7. (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda RX-7 | 1997 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-7 | C70 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 246 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2800 mm |