1986 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2002 Samsung SM3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Samsung SM3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mazda RX-7 | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Samsung |
| Model | RX-7 | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2354 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 246 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2540 mm |
