1986 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 185 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2004 Suzuki XL7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda RX-7. (246 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda RX-7 | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | RX-7 | XL7 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 246 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2810 mm |